IDF Takes Out Loaded Iranian Missile Launcher Seconds Before Launch.

Israeli fighter jets just smoked a ballistic missile launcher in Iran that was fully loaded and minutes away from firing on Israeli cities. Drone footage shows the precise strike turning the threat into a fireball in real time.

This wasn't luck. It was sharp intelligence and decisive action under Operation Roaring Lion, Israel's relentless campaign to dismantle Iran's missile machine. The IDF has already taken out hundreds of launchers, destroyed production sites, and neutralized thousands of missiles before they could rain down on civilians.

While Iran keeps launching attacks that have killed innocents and damaged Israeli towns, Israel is systematically degrading the regime's ability to strike again.

Pre-emptive force works. Weakness invites more rockets.

No more waiting for the next barrage. Hit them first, hit them hard, and keep the pressure on until the threat is gone. Well done, IDF.

More Of Haman Gallows Meant For Mordecai And The Jews Crushed!

Israel Crushes Iran's Missile Machine: Production Slashed to Zero

The IDF has delivered a decisive blow: Iran's ballistic missile production is now at zero. Key manufacturing sites—hit hard in the ongoing U.S.-Israeli campaign—lie in ruins, halting what was once a ramp-up to dozens of missiles per month.

Before the war escalated, Tehran was aggressively rebuilding and expanding its arsenal after earlier setbacks. That pipeline is severed. Launchers are down by around 70%, stockpiles are depleting fast, and barrages against Israel have dropped dramatically—by up to 90% in recent assessments.

This isn't just tactical; it's strategic.

A regime that once threatened the region with overwhelming missile salvos now struggles to sustain even limited fire. Iran remains dangerous with whatever reserves it hides, but the industrial base that fed its aggression is gone—for now.

The message is clear: aggression meets overwhelming force, and tyrants who bet on missiles over moderation pay the price. Preventing rebuilds will be the next critical fight. Victory belongs to those who defend freedom without apology.

Statement By Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu On Larijani Elimination

"This morning, we eliminated Ali Larijani. Ali Larijani is the boss of the Revolutionary Guards, that group of gangsters that effectively runs Iran. Alongside him, we also eliminated the commander of the Basij – they are the gangsters' assistants who are terrorizing the population in the streets of Tehran and other Iranian cities. We are operating there as well; operating from the air with Air Force jets and UAVs.

We are undermining this regime in the hope of giving the Iranian people an opportunity to remove it. It will not happen all at once, and it will not happen easily. But if we persist, we will give them the chance to take their destiny into their own hands.

At the same time, we are helping our American friends in the Gulf. I spoke at length with President Trump on this matter yesterday.

There is cooperation between our air forces and navies, between myself and President Trump and his staff. We will assist both through indirect attacks, which create immense pressure on the Iranian regime, and through direct actions. There are many more surprises. 'By stratagems, you shall make war.' We will not reveal all the stratagems here, but as I told you, there are many.

Now, regarding another matter: the most important thing for winning a war is determination: Determination, determination, determination.

The determination of the leaders, the determination of the commanders, and the determination of the people. We are determined to win, and we will achieve these goals.

I ask you to simply ignore the 'channels of gloom.' We are achieving historical milestones. With G-d’s help, we have reached a point where, after October 7, when we were on the brink of an abyss, we are now a formidable power, almost a global one, fighting shoulder-to-shoulder with our friend, the global superpower. This is already a massive achievement in the face of all the threats coming our way. What other country has these capabilities?

They are all under attack. Who else has these strengths of ours – the alliances, the IDF, the Air Force, and a strong nation? So, stay strong.

I want to tell you: We will also help you. Regarding everything related to compensation, I have instructed that the framework be presented to you and that it be expanded. We will help the North, and we will help everyone in need, just as we did previously in Operation Rising Lion and during COVID-19. We will do it even more vigorously this time."

Reason Why Persia Change It's Name To Iran

The Real reason why Persia decided to change its name to Iran goes thus:

‎‎'Iran' was adopted as the nation's official title in 1935 - but why?

‎After being subjected to missile attacks from Israel last week and having three of its nuclear bases bombed by Donald Trump over the weekend, Iran's political and militant history has been splashed across headlines around the globe.

Among the various questions raised by spectators of the ongoing Middle Eastern turmoil of recent years, however, is one that many have wondered for centuries now - why Iran was ever called Persia, and when the country's official title was changed.

‎When does Iranian civilisation date back to?

‎Historians and archaeologists have traced the early beginnings of Iranian civilisation back to the 6th century B.C., when the Achaemenid Empire expanded its vast territories and enhanced its culture under its leader, Cyrus the Great.

Cyrus hailed from 'Parsa', a region in the southwestern area of the country.

‎As such, classical historians later propagated the term 'Persian' to describe the entire kingdom which ruled alongside their Greek, Arab and early Roman neighbours in the era of antiquity.

‎How did the Iranians refer to themselves?

‎Until 1935, Iran was known as Persia by Western civilisations, making the title an exonym (a name given by outsiders)

‎According to Far Horizons, throughout this time, the vast majority of citizens of Iran called their country 'Arya', or 'Airyan', with the indigenous term signifying the land of the Aryans, which the Iranian people called themselves.

‎This term was deep-rooted in Iran's ancient texts, as well as its Zoroastrian scriptures, and serves to describe Iranian identity beyond its ancient conquests and geography.

‎Why was the name changed?

‎As we say, however, in 1935, the name 'Iran' was officially adopted by Reza Shah Pahlavi - the Shah of Iran from 1925 to 1941.

‎The move was made in an attempt to reconnect the country's classical history, rich culture and its step forward to becoming a modern Middle Eastern nation.

It was about Iran redefining its identity, and served as a declaration of cultural sovereignty.

‎The UK's Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs recorded Iran's name-change at the time, documenting: "On the 25th December [1934] the Persian Ministry for Foreign Affairs addressed a circular memorandum to the Foreign Diplomatic Missions in Tehran requesting that the terms 'Iran' and 'Iranian' might be used in official correspondence and conversation as from the next 21st March, instead of the words "Persia" and 'Persian' hitherto in current use.

"His Majesty's Minister in Tehran has been instructed to accede to this request."

‎Was it ever called 'Persia' again?

‎Short answer, yes.

‎When World War II broke out in 1939, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill requested that the Iranian government revert its name back temporarily, and for 'Persia to be used by the United Nations [i.e., the Allies] for the duration of the common War'.

‎Though Churchill's request was approved by the Iranian Foreign Ministry, it was largely ignored - especially by the Americans, who'd had little involvement with Iraq so far, and saw no reason to confuse things.

By 1959, Iranian leaders had gathered together after a number of political powers complained about not knowing the correct way to refer to the country.

‎It was eventually decided that the names 'Persia' and 'Iran' could be used interchangeably - though the former would be most appropriately used to describe the nation's culture and history, and the latter, its modern day politics and current affairs.

‎